I play music sometimes (but not often lately) and am majoring in Women & Gender Studies at UNCG. I love friends and music and cassette tapes and writing letters,
You can tell me things through my ask box or through email at: jakenned.91@gmail.com
King Butterlies
Nonsexual Intimacy
For Asexual Awareness Week, Elizabeth Barrette, aka ysabetwordsmith, posted a list of types of nonsexual intimacy that I found really interesting both as an asexual and as a writer:
I think this is really interesting, and its good to keep in mind there are other beautiful ways to be intimate with a person, asexual or not.
(via The First Snow & Adventures In Zine Organization | fight boredom zine distro & blog)
i spot hoax #2 & #3 (and #2 of my perzine, you’ve got a friend in pennsylvania)! yeah!
- sari
RED FOREST DISTRO PATCH GIVEAWAY
Enter to win the following patches
-‘ACAB’ ALL CATS ARE BEAUTIFUL PATCH
-CATS RULE EVERYTHING AROUND ME PATCH
-MISPRINT PATCH SET (4 MISPRINTED PATCHES) you will get different ones then the ones pictured, and different ones then those in the giveaway
All you need to do to enter is reblog this post as many times as you like! (more times=more probability of winning) winner will be chosen randomly and then messaged via tumblr.
and follow us at our RED FOREST DISTRO blog.
WINNER WILL BE ANNOUNCED ON FEB. 9TH
On This Day in 2009: When Palestinian children returned to school for the first day of classes since Israel’s deadly assault on Gaza ended, not all pupils showed up. Some students had to be excused for not attending after being killed by the Israeli army during its three-week bombing campaign of the besieged strip.
Over 300 Palestinian children were killed in ‘Operation Cast Lead’ — between 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009 — which took the lives of over 1,400 Palestinians in total.
Signs replaced the once-occupied seats at al-Fakhura School in the Jabaliya refugee camp in Gaza; names of victims written under the word in red: ‘Martyr’, 24 January, 2009.
(Photo: Anja Niedringhaus / AP)
“I’m the Doctor! And I just snogged Madame de Pompadour!”
As defined by urban dictionary, the friendzone is…
“When you are expected to support a girl you really like while she searches for a smarter, richer, and more handsome boyfriend. There is little you can do without feeling like a dick. All in all, one of the meanest things a girl can do, whether they mean it or not.”
and ”The perennial location of nice guys everywhere.”
Although this hypothetical situation could work both ways, friendzone is almost always applied to a man who is rejected by a woman. Therefore, there is something inherently unequal, something inherently sexist about the term “friendzone”. But what and why?
From my experience, this is what friend zone is. A “nice guy” pursues a woman, but isn’t forward with his intentions from the get-go like, say, a “jerk”. The woman is pleased to see a man who is interested in her not as a sexual object but as a human being and wishes for things to stay that way. The man is not satisfied with seeing the woman as a human being because being “expected to support a girl” is a bad deal if she’s not putting out.
Before I delve into the sociological aspects of this, I just want to point out that ”friendzone” is no more pleasant for a woman than it is a man. First, that is to say unrequited love works both ways, but the person who doesn’t return affections is considered mean only when she’s a woman. And second, what option does the woman have in a traditional “friendzone” situation? Just stop talking to a close friend to avoid “leading him on”? In high school, I found out my best friend of 2 years liked me. Having to tell him I didn’t feel the same way and being immediately ex-communicated via Facebook status (“Thanks for wasting my time”) was one of the worst things that ever happened to me. Were our two years of friendship invalid because I didn’t want anything more? Was all our time together really wasted because there was no hypothetical pay off?
Guys who do this and claim to be “nice guys” are the worst misogynists because of their sense of entitlement toward a woman. They make investments in property and expect their dividends. They are fake friends. They are selfish. And they will jump at the chance to vilify you and victimize themselves when their attempts at manipulation don’t work. Clearly, “friendzone” is the remnant of a phenomenon that has plagued women since the beginning of time: women are not independent creatures. Our love lives exist only in the context of a man’s desire. When we make independent decisions, we are subject to a host of derogatory terms. “Slut” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “yes”. “Friendzone” is how we vilify a woman for exercising her right to say “no”.
I’ve kinda had this happen to me a few times. Like a dude will be friends with me, then I mention I have a boyfriend and all of a sudden they are passive aggressive jerks who don’t talk to you anymore. Sorry being buds wasn’t good enough for you? Jeeze. Luckily there’s been other times where a dude just gets a little disappointed but still stays friends with me and doesn’t get douchy :)





